Geldpolitik: Anwendung
Geldpolitik: Anwendung
to Unit page

Commentary for teachers

Monetary policy: Application

Overview

Topic and contents

This unit deals with the conduct of monetary policy, the core task of a central bank.

It focuses on the two main goals of a central bank (ensuring price stability while taking due account of economic developments), the most important monetary policy instrument (key interest rate), and the correlations between this instrument and both target variables (inflation and economic activity).

Didactic format

The highlight of the unit is Mopos, a web-based simulation centred around a simplified virtual economy.

In Mopos (derived from ‘monetary policy simulation’), students act as members of a central bank’s board and steer the monetary policy of a fictional country. This involves conducting a series of monetary policy assessments, each of which results in an interest rate decision (1 round = 1 quarter).

The simulation game can be played in pairs or in groups of three. For class, we recommend using the scenario mode, which offers a choice of four predefined scenarios. Each one includes a briefing that describes the initial situation and the task. Upon completion of a scenario, the simulation generates a debriefing and gives feedback. This is followed by a debriefing session with the whole class, based on the key questions posed in the briefing.

To open the Mopos simulation, go to mopos.iconomix.ch. Technical requirements are an internet connection and a widely used browser.

Time required

Two to four lessons

Suitable subjects

Focus subject economics and law

Level

Intermediate to demanding

Resources accompanying the unit

The ‘Monetary policy: Application’ unit consists of this commentary for teachers and the following teaching material:

Competence-oriented learning goals

Students are able to …

  • name the core tasks and main instrument of monetary policy, and describe the monetary policy decision-making process.
  • describe the fundamental interdependencies between key interest rates, inflation and economic activity.
  • make well-founded monetary policy decisions based on the given economic conditions.
  • analyse, critically reflect on and evaluate their monetary policy decisions based on simulation results.
  • present their reflections and evaluations in a clear, structured and comprehensible manner.

Notes regarding this unit

Economic background

A modern central bank essentially pursues two goals: price stability as the primary objective and balanced economic development as an important secondary objective.

The central bank uses its key interest rate as an instrument to achieve both of these goals. An increase in the key rate usually leads to lower inflation and weaker economic activity, while a decrease tends to result in higher inflation and stronger economic activity.

The central bank’s board makes interest rate decisions at regular intervals. For this purpose, it analyses the course of key economic variables, such as inflation (as an indicator of price stability) and the output gap (as a measure of economic performance), in the current quarter as well as previous quarters. In addition, it prepares forecasts on future developments in inflation and economic activity. These forecasts also depend on the applicable key interest rate, which influences both variables. Based on this comprehensive analysis, the central bank decides whether a monetary policy adjustment is necessary.

A number of factors complicate the conduct of monetary policy:

  • There is one instrument (key interest rate) for two goals (price stability and balanced economic development).
  • Inflation reacts with some delay to interest rate adjustments.
  • In addition to monetary policy, events that cannot be foreseen with any degree of certainty (known as macroeconomic shocks) influence the economy.

Which shocks appear in Mopos?

Four types of shocks come into play in Mopos. The effects of these is not limited to the short term, but can persist over several periods before disappearing again.

  • Demand shocks (long-term effects), e.g. a decline in export demand
  • Supply shocks (very long-term effects), e.g. a disruption in global supply chains
  • Inflation shocks (short-term effects), e.g. a sudden rise in commodity prices
  • Exchange rate shocks (very long-term effects), e.g. an abrupt appreciation of national currency

When forecasting inflation and economic activity, the most plausible assumptions possible are made with regard to the future development of shocks. As these assumptions are not usually accurate, the actual values may differ from those forecast.

Economic model behind Mopos

The Mopos simulation is based on an economic model that reflects the overall dynamics of an economy. The model is depicted in a stylised manner, with many details of the real economy deliberately omitted. For instance, it does not address the interaction between various industries, differentiate between key interest rates and market interest rates, or include stock or real estate markets; not even the labour market is explicitly part of the model. By dispensing with such elements, however, the underlying dynamics of the economy become all the more apparent.

The data simulated in Mopos is based on real economic conditions, but does not relate to a particular country. The model is designed in such a way that, with prolonged play and repeated use, certain statistical patterns emerge, similar to those observed in the Swiss economy in the 1990s and 2000s, up until the financial crisis of 2007/2008.

The model also sets some restrictions when it comes to monetary policy. For example, unconventional monetary policy measures such as foreign exchange market interventions or negative interest rates are not included; only conventional interest rate steering is available.

Technical details on the model can be found in the ‘Model principles’ text (in German only) under ‘Extras’.

Simulation details

Mopos can be played in two game modes:

  • Scenario mode: Simulation of monetary policy using predefined scenarios. The task is easier or harder to complete depending on the scenario selected (cf. section ‘Possible lesson plan’). Upon completion of a scenario, the simulation immediately provides feedback. This is the recommended mode for getting started with Mopos.
  • Random mode: Simulation of monetary policy using randomly generated scenarios. The scenarios are designed in such a way that no one has to take the helm in the middle of a crisis. The level of difficulty in this mode depends on the generated situation. Each random initial situation can be replicated exactly at any time via an automatically generated link and thus repeated. The random mode is particularly suited to advanced students.

Why does Mopos feature a scenario mode?

In random mode, Mopos starts with a randomly generated situation, making it difficult for teachers to monitor the process and give students clear exercises and targeted feedback.

For this reason, Mopos also offers a scenario mode, with a choice of four predefined scenarios. Each one includes a briefing that describes the initial situation and the task. Upon completion of a scenario, feedback is displayed directly in the simulation.

Important note: In scenario mode, the shocks – the economic drivers in the model – do not behave as they should according to model theory. Technically speaking, the shocks are not purely random and independent of each other (not ‘white noise’), but are time dependent (autocorrelated). This is a result of the way in which the scenarios were designed.

In the simulation, players adopt the role of members of the central bank’s board. This involves conducting a series of monetary policy assessments, each of which results in an interest rate decision (1 round = 1 quarter).

Each interest rate round consists of the following phases of the monetary policy decision-making process:

  • Analysis of current situation: The first phase focuses on examining the current economic situation as measured by the two key indicators of inflation (as an indicator of price stability) and the output gap (as a measure of economic performance). This involves assessing how the situation has changed since the last monetary policy assessment. In the meantime, a quarter has passed and in addition to monetary policy and historical dynamics, macroeconomic shocks – unforeseeable events of economic significance – have affected the economy.
  • Forecast and interest rate decision: The second phase concentrates on the future. Since the effect of interest rate changes is delayed, a forward-looking approach to monetary policy is necessary. To assess whether an interest rate adjustment is necessary – and if so, in which direction and to what extent – the simulation provides conditional forecasts for inflation and the output gap, depending on the currently selected key interest rate. The rate can be adjusted in increments of 25 basis points. If the forecasts indicate a threat to price stability or a boom or recession (on the assumption that the interest rate remains unchanged), monetary policy action is required. At the end of this phase, an interest rate decision must be made and confirmed.

The simulation then jumps forward to the next quarter. The next interest rate round is approaching, during which the same two phases will be repeated.

Why are shocks not displayed as time series in scenario mode?

In scenario mode, the effect of the shocks is demonstrated with a short animation. This change from previous versions of Mopos offers certain advantages from a learning perspective. Experience has shown that students often try to derive information from the shock time series that they are unable to provide. This distracted attention from the current situation and the new forecast, both of which are decisive for the next interest rate decision.

At the end of a scenario, the ‘Review of your term in office’ screen is displayed. The debriefing clearly summarises the term in office using charts and key figures. These show how well the monetary policy objectives – price stability and balanced economic development – have been achieved (fulfilment of mandate). In addition, the briefing for each scenario contains benchmark values that can be used as a reference for the evaluation (think ‘Taylor rule;’ for details, see the relevant briefing). The emoji feedback provides a visual evaluation based on the mandate criteria and benchmark values.

The ‘Review of your term in office’ screen can either be downloaded or shared by email.

Notes for random mode

In random mode, the impact of the individual shock types for the relevant quarter is represented by arrows. These indicate the direction of the shock (positive or negative) and its strength (neutral, medium, strong).

Once a minimum number of quarters have been played, the debriefing page can be accessed on demand (as an ‘interim analysis’). Unlike scenario mode, the simulation in random mode can be stopped and restarted at any time. However, no benchmark values or emoji feedback are available in this mode.

Random mode: Beware the liquidity trap!

The liquidity trap occurs when interest rates reach their effective lower bound and monetary policy stimuli remain ineffective. What this means in Mopos is that the interest rate cannot be lowered any further, and other forms of monetary policy easing are also not available. Under these circumstances, real interest rates rise (due to deflation), which further slows the economy.

For various reasons, the economic model behind Mopos is far more likely to end up in this situation than a real economy. Should this occur, a sensible strategy would be to lower the key interest rate to zero early on, leave it there for a number of periods, and hope that the economy will recover on its own.

Additional countermeasures such as a substantial increase in government spending, a targeted weakening of the national currency (by selling the domestic currency against foreign currencies), quantitative easing of monetary policy (by purchasing securities in the domestic currency) or negative interest rates are not available in Mopos.

Once the model economy has become sufficiently stuck in the liquidity trap and no shock is large enough to free it from this situation, there is no way out. The only option is to end the simulation and start again.

Possible lesson plan

The skills specified in the learning goals can be developed in the following two phases:

Phase 1: Introduction to topic and simulation

The Mopos simulation game is the main component of the first phase. We recommend starting with scenario mode and proceeding as follows:

  • Introduction (approx. 10 minutes): Brief introduction to the concept behind Mopos using the ‘Introduction to Mopos: Scenario mode’ slide set.
  • Demo (approx. 5 minutes): As a warm-up, the teacher can briefly demonstrate on the projector how to start the simulation, ideally up to the ‘Quick briefing’ screen after the scenario selection. The subsequent steps are clearly described in the briefing texts for each scenario.
  • Task (approx. 30 minutes): Transition to pair or group work based on the briefing texts for the scenarios. From a didactical perspective, it makes no difference whether all groups work on the same scenario or not.

There are four predefined scenarios to choose from in scenario mode.

‘Calm waters’ (easy)

In line with normal economic development. The mandate can be fulfilled without difficulty; hitting the benchmark can be challenging.

‘Soft landing’ (easy to intermediate)

If interest rates are not raised quickly enough, there is a risk of inflation; if they are raised too quickly, the economy will slide into recession. The mandate can be fulfilled without difficulty; hitting the benchmark should be possible.

‘Threat of deflation’ (intermediate to demanding)

Multiple changes in interest rate policy necessary; timing is critical. Fulfilling the mandate is challenging; hitting the benchmark is very difficult.

‘Stagflation’ (demanding)

Students have to choose between returning to price stability or combating deep recession. The mandate cannot be fulfilled; hitting the benchmark is challenging.

Phase 2: Debriefing and reflection

Upon completion of the simulation, the students write an accountability report on their term in office, addressed to ‘parliament’, i.e. the class. This report can be based on the following key questions (cf. briefing texts):

  1. Decision-making process: How did you as a team determine the key interest rate? Were there any differences of opinion, and if so, how were they resolved?
  2. Developments in inflation and economic activity: How did inflation and economic activity develop during your term in office? Analyse this using the ‘Review of your term in office’ screen (‘debriefing’ for short).
  3. Fulfilment of mandate: How successful have you been in fulfilling the monetary policy mandate – price stability and balanced economic development? What went well, what difficulties arose? Base your evaluation on the debriefing.
  4. Key decisions: Which interest rate decisions were particularly challenging or significant during your term in office? In hindsight, would you decide differently? Why?
  5. Challenges: What factors made it difficult for you to steer monetary policy in the best possible direction? To what extent did the economic and inflation forecasts help you deal with the uncertainties?
  6. Optional – Correlation with actual monetary policy: What similarities and differences do you see between the simulation and the real challenges of monetary policy, for example at the Swiss National Bank?

The second phase concludes with students studying the advanced text in class or as homework. This helps deepen their understanding of the core economic concept behind monetary policy and explains the most important technical terms again in detail.

Why Mopos has no worksheets

An action-oriented simulation such as Mopos is especially effective when students evaluate their decisions, processes and results subjectively using specific key questions and place them in a broader context.

Reflecting in this way on the proposed key questions promotes higher-level skills such as critical thinking, problem-solving and linking theory and practice. It helps students gain a deep understanding of economic relationships and develop well-founded arguments independently – key skills for effective learning and comprehensive understanding.

For a review of monetary policy concepts and mechanisms, as well as their relevance for the SNB’s monetary policy practice, please refer to the ‘Basic knowledge’ worksheet from the related ‘Monetary policy: Fundamentals’ unit.

Overview of possible lesson plan

  Steps Description Media/material Time
Phase 1


45 minutes
Start Introduction to concept behind Mopos using slide set
Short demo of Mopos up to ‘Task’ screen after scenario selection
‘Introduction to Mopos: Scenario mode’ slides
Laptop or tablet and projector
15 minutes
Simulation Transition to pair or group work based on briefing texts for scenarios Mopos
Briefing texts
Laptop or tablet
30 minutes
Phase 2


90 minutes
Debriefing and reflection Preparation of presentation based on key questions from briefing, individually or in pairs Briefing texts 45 minutes (Alternatively: Outside of class)
Presentation and discussion in class Projector or visualiser 45 minutes
Theory input Study advanced text (possibly as homework) Advanced text Recommendation: Outside of class